Jamaica has joined the modern era when it comes to sexual harassment. A bill passed last week that is set to change the culture of tolerating sexual touching has made headlines and been on the lips of everyone everywhere because of the monumental shift it could create.

Published July 14, 2021

Butt slaps, touching new frontier of debate as harassment law passed

Nadine Wilson-Henry/Senior Staff Reporter

JUSTICE MINISTER Delroy Chuck is hoping that the Sexual Harassment Bill that was passed on Tuesday will send a clear signal about new norms of engagement with women, but he has serious concerns that the tribunal established to review cases will face challenges.

The legislation is expected to mark a major cultural shift in a country that has high levels of tolerance for sexual touching, catcalling, and suggestive paralanguage.

Finding the balance between an affectionate touch and an inappropriate slap could prove difficult in the early stages when the law takes effect, said the justice minister.

“There is no reason why any employer or any man should be slapping a woman on her bottom or on her chest, so that is the extreme, but we cannot ignore where an affectionate touch on the shoulder or on the elbow or a squeeze of the hand is deemed to be sexual

harassment,” Chuck said prior to the passage of the bill in the House of Representatives on Tuesday.

The Sexual Harassment (Protection and Prevention) Act, 2021 passed the committee stage with 10 amendments.

Gender Minister Olivia Grange, who chaired the joint select committee that reviewed proposals for the bill, stressed that the law was gender-neutral because both men and women were susceptible to sexual harassment.

Victims of workplace harassment can make complaints directly to the tribunal to guard against undue prejudice. The tribunal will also consider complaints from tenants who are being sexually harassed by their landlords.

While assuring lawmakers of the Opposition’s support, Manchester North West Member of Parliament Mikael Phillips said that an appropriate legislative remedy should be considered to protect victims from unintended consequences that may arise from filing a sexual harassment claim.

He also questioned the rationale behind the setting-up of a separate tribunal to hear sex harassment cases.

Phillips said that there is a need for the legislation to mandate employers to provide on-the-job sexual harassment prevention exposure. 

This is a production independent of The Gleaner Company (Media) Limited's newsroom. For feedback: contact the Digital Integration and Marketing Department at Newsletters@gleanerjm.com