‘No’ means ‘no’

THE EDITOR, Madam:

I am expressing the sentiments of many in the diaspora in full support of the decision by the Jamaican Government to the request for the approval and recognition of the same-sex partner of an American diplomat, with all diplomatic rights and privileges offered by the Government of Jamaica. The individual was submitted for assignment in Jamaica by the US diplomatic corps.

Our country does not recognise same-sex marriage. This response has drawn discussion, and not debate.

Your personal lifestyle is not being judged or restricted if you refrain from forcing others to follow you.

It is the belief that this decision and demand by the United States is biased, provocative and unjust. It (effectively) asks the Jamaican Government to disregard the moral position of its people, in addition to the removal of a sitting diplomat and a consul general after their term has expired.

‘No’ means ‘no’ in any language.

It is the right of every individual to express and expect the respect and appropriate response to this stated expression of will, and the decision of others on actions/decisions that affect their moral right/dignity.

This is an example of abuse of power, where an individual who chooses to, demands the rights of another.

What about the spiritual beliefs and objectives of a country founded on its belief in the Creator, independence, and the acknowledgement of diversity and the freedom of its people to worship all religions?

H. PATRICK BROWN

Pembroke Pines

Florida