Mon | Jun 29, 2026

Prince Harry challenges decision to strip him of security in Britain after he moved to US

Published:Tuesday | December 5, 2023 | 9:33 AM
Prince Harry leaves the High Court after giving evidence in London, Tuesday, June 6, 2023. Prince Harry is challenging on Tuesday, December 5, 2023, the British government’s decision to strip him of his security detail after he gave up his status as a working member of the royal family and moved to the United States. The Duke of Sussex said he wants protection when he visits home and claimed it's partly because an aggressive press jeopardizes his safety and that of his family. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali, File)

LONDON (AP) — A lawyer for Prince Harry on Tuesday challenged the British government's decision to strip him of his security detail after he gave up his status as a working member of the royal family and moved to the United States.

The Duke of Sussex has claimed that his safety is jeopardised in part because of hostility toward him and his family on social media and a relentless press that hounds him.

Attorney Shaheed Fatima said the group that evaluated Harry's security needs — known by the acronym of its former name, the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC) — acted irrationally and treated him unfairly by failing to follow its own policies that required applying a risk analysis about the duke's safety.

“RAVEC should have considered the 'impact' that a successful attack on the claimant would have, bearing in mind his status, background and profile within the royal family — which he was born into and which he will have for the rest of his life,” Fatima said.

“RAVEC should have considered, in particular, the impact on the United Kingdom's reputation of a successful attack on the claimant.”

The three-day hearing in London's High Court is the latest in a string of Harry's legal cases that have kept London judges busy as he takes on the UK government and the British tabloid media.

Harry was not in court as attorneys presented opening remarks at a hearing set to be held largely behind closed doors to discuss sensitive security matters.

The judge is expected to rule at a later date.

Harry failed to persuade a different judge earlier this year that he should be able to privately pay for London's police force to guard him when he comes to town.

A judge denied that offer after a government lawyer argued that officers shouldn't be used as “private bodyguards for the wealthy.”

Follow The Gleaner on X, formerly Twitter, and Instagram @JamaicaGleaner and on Facebook @GleanerJamaica. Send us a message on WhatsApp at 1-876-499-0169 or email us at onlinefeedback@gleanerjm.com or editors@gleanerjm.com.