Stanford lawyers seeks to remove Baker Botts from case

Lawyers representing accused financier R. Allen Stanford are seeking to get Baker Botts removed from a role in the case, according to an article by Debra Cassens Weiss on www.abajournal.com.



Baker Botts represents the court-appointed receiver overseeing Stanford\'s businesses. Court papers claim the law firm has a conflict of interest because it represents Stanford and his father from 1985 to 1987 and helped set up the offshore bank now accused of promising improbable returns on certificates of deposit in an $8 billion investment fraud.



\"Baker Botts\' flagrant violation of its duty of loyalty to the Stanford defenders warrants its immediate disqualification from the instant litigation,\" the motion says. The filing seeks to block the law firm, which has already billed millions of dollars of fees in the case, from testifying against Stanford, a CNBC report has said.



Baker Botts spokesman Michael Cinelli told Reuters that the firm has no record of ever representing Stanford or the offshore bank, although the firm did represent a related party seeking to do business in the Caribbean.



Stanford faces a civil suit by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and has not been indicted on criminal charges.