Mon | Jul 27, 2026

Letter of the Day | When democracy whispers

Published:Thursday | May 1, 2025 | 12:06 AM
Elections Canada signage is seen as voters arrive at a polling station on Election Day in Halifax, Canada, Monday, April 28.
Elections Canada signage is seen as voters arrive at a polling station on Election Day in Halifax, Canada, Monday, April 28.

THE EDITOR, Madam:

Canada held its federal election on April 28, 2025 and what stood out most was not what happened, but what didn’t.

There were no motorcades. No flag-waving crowds. No energetic last-minute rallies shaking the streets. The neighbourhoods remained calm. Yet, the business of choosing a government moved forward with quiet efficiency.

The most notable aspect was how ordinary everything seemed. Schools remained open. Teachers taught. The main change came from children reporting that gym class was held outdoors because their gymnasiums were used as polling stations.

Most of them, in fact, welcomed the change with glee. After casting their votes, people went to work. Shops stayed open. Government offices functioned as usual. The country did not pause to participate in democracy; it simply wove it into the rhythm of the day.

I do not share this to diminish Jamaica’s electoral spirit. Ours is a democracy forged in the fires of resistance and self-determination. Our political expression carries the echoes of hard-won independence, ancestral pride, and a belief that governance is deeply personal. We are a passionate, expressive people, and that passion has shaped our civic identity.

Still, I found myself wondering: must our civic atmosphere shift so dramatically to accommodate voting? While many schools are closed to facilitate polling and some businesses shorten hours to give staff time to vote, the energy often feels more like a festival, or a showdown, than a quiet exercise in citizenship. Must our political expression always be loud to be legitimate? What if quiet confidence in the process allowed us to participate without all the fanfare?

Perhaps we can begin to imagine a civic culture where elections are sacred, but not disruptive. Where children remember election day not for the tension in the air, but for the joy of an unexpected outdoor class. Where democracy is more about shared responsibility than a performance.

This is not a call for silence, but rather a sense of calm and composure.

Picture an election day that prioritises dignity rather than theatrical displays. Imagine a democracy that motivates participation through respectful discourse rather than chaos. Ultimately, our democracy prospers not from confusion, but from the trust and active engagement of its citizens by simply participating in the voting process.

YASHEKA WALTERS-ELLIS