Issue: Leaders or gangsters?

THE EDITOR, Sir:

Elections in Jamaica have long been dogged by violence and corruption promulgated by both politicians and civilians independently. The Gleaner's recent classification of the two major political parties as 'gangs' has left me to wonder what to expect next from the gangs. My main concern is the upcoming elections and what to expect.

The 2007 general election was somewhat of a change from what Jamaicans were used to seeing in politics. The elections were dubbed fair and, most important, the level of violence was curbed.

Worrying classification

Whatever caused this slight reduction in the level of violence and corruption, we hope it plays a part in the next general election.

The Gleaner's classification of the two major parties as gangs leaves me worried. Are they insinuating that the 'gangsters' within these gangs cannot be controlled and will do whatever it takes to keep the power they have? Do these 'gangsters' have the country's best interest at heart?

The negative stigma attached to the word 'gang' ought not to be attached to any reference made regarding leaders of our country. What is the message being conveyed, I ask The Gleaner? Should we assign the negative stigma and expect chaos from our leaders?

Our leaders must erase the negative perception. Jamaica looks forward to seeing economic growth, increased opportunities for all, and a further decrease in crime. If these things are attained, the negative connotation given to the word 'gang' will be obliterated from the minds of Jamaicans.

I am, etc.,

JAVID BROWN

javid@stu.ncu.edu.jm

Cedar Grove, Manchester