Letter of the Day | Is Portmore becoming a parish a bad thing?
THE EDITOR, Madam:
The ongoing debate about whether Portmore should become a parish has sparked a range of opinions. While some argue that granting Portmore parish status will bring economic growth, improved governance, and increased investment, others believe it could lead to unnecessary administrative costs and potential inefficiencies. The question remains: is this transition beneficial for the people of Portmore and the wider country?
One of the main arguments in favour of Portmore’s parish status is that it already functions as a distinct urban centre. With a growing population, vibrant businesses, and unique infrastructural needs, Portmore has long operated like a city separate from St Catherine. Making it a parish would give it the autonomy to address its development needs more efficiently, rather than depending on the Spanish Town-based municipal system.
Additionally, parish status could lead to greater investment in Portmore’s infrastructure. As a standalone parish, it may receive more funding from the government for roads, healthcare, schools, and public transportation. This could enhance the quality of life for residents and attract more businesses, leading to job creation and economic expansion.
However, there are valid concerns about the financial burden of creating a new parish. Establishing a separate administrative system, including a new parish council, governmental offices, and additional public services, would require significant funding. Some argue that these resources could be better spent improving existing infrastructure and services rather than creating new bureaucratic structures.
Another potential drawback is the impact on St Catherine. By Portmore becoming a parish, St Catherine could lose a major contributor to its economy.
Questions remain about whether this change would address the longstanding issues affecting Portmore. Traffic congestion, flooding, and crime are major challenges that require strategic planning and investment. Some sceptics worry that a change in status alone will not solve these problems, unless accompanied by comprehensive policies and effective leadership.
Some fear that the push for parish status is more about political gains than genuine development for the people of Portmore. If not handled properly, this could lead to increased division and scepticism among residents.
Despite these concerns, it is undeniable that Portmore has grown beyond being just a dormitory community for Kingston and Spanish Town. Whether or not parish status is granted, there needs to be a well-thought-out plan to address its rapid urbanisation and ensure sustainable development for the future.
Ultimately, the decision should be based on thorough research, consultations with stakeholders, and careful consideration of both benefits and challenges.
ARTNEL SIMON
